Naval combat would be a waste of resources considering how little you spend on the water. Honestly with how great the diplomacy is 3K is off to one of the best starts ever.Vanila rome/medieval 2/empire/whatever is more replayable.New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be castA subreddit for the Total War strategy game series, made by Creative Assembly. 84 comments. Close. 245 comments. The shitstorm that would bring would be massive.No ships or naval battles is still a big negative for me. Sure, but there's hardly any games that can hold my attention beyond that point, and I'm planning to get back to it as soon as Eight Princes comes out. Rome 1 released 15 years ago still catches me by surprise time to time, for example by how detailed and in-depth its personality traits system is and how it is associated with politics and even generals' speeches. share.

May 3, 2010. That means I'd been wishing for TW:TK to come out for 15 years since 2004 when I first played Rome. Even though it kinda pains me to admit this, I prefer playing unfamiliar WH to TK whose lore I'm practically in love with.

But to each there own, I definitely think the unique hero collect them all kind of feel helps make up for the lack of unitsI don't understand why people complain about fatigue after 100+ hours. I'm most likely gonna get down voted for this but even as I enjoy playing the game, I feel like my initial excitement is gradually being replaced by disappointment in some aspects of the game. Cake Day. save hide report. At this point the only clear edges in the gameplay of TK are the short turn-time and diplomacy. You've got family, civic, military and faction option tabs. Medieval 2 didn't have much unit variety compared to Rome 1; most core units were copy-pasted version of other countries with changed stats and modeling, but it was sufficient to make each faction feel unique and somewhat different from others because slight varieties still shifted balance and unit combinations between nations.

TK really needed unit variety at least at Medieval 2 level to guarantee fun gameplay for a long time in which aspect the game completely failed. Yi master archers too are another copy of Yi archers with a strip added in the middle of their bow. Posted by 1 year ago. Am I taking a break from it after 100 hours? I'm a big history & ROTK buff. It's not a bug, you're not on the right spy options menu. As for Shogon comparison, for all intents and purposes TK shouldn't be compared to 10 years old historical titles, but Rome 2, Attila and WH1&2. share. Archived. Using Reddit. its very luckluster , it's always the same armies,on both sides. Provide Context for Screenshots. save hide report. Alas, in my eyes it seems to have failed.I think the low player retention rate does show some of my points valid to an extent(it will go up once 8 princes is released, but it's too low for a game released 2 months ago for a game that sold more than WH series; it's also lower ratio compared to both WH 1&2 two months after the release). Even my top general cant kill him. 93% Upvoted. I would still consider TK a fine TW game overall with possibly the best game campaign experience, but as a long time fan of this time period and someone who prefers history to fantasy, TK wasn't worked to the point to match the WH series in terms of battle and related aspects including animation, modeling, etc, which you could call the core contents of TW game. Once all the DLC for Three Kingdoms has been released (which is going to include more playable factions and cultures with different unit rosters, as well as more portraits) I think the game will feel quite replayable and packed with content, just as Warhammer I did at the end of its content cycle. Created May 3, 2010. That's impressive even in the game market without a competitive scene.And of course the same retread of the game being compared to ones with years of development cycles. 279 comments. Now im being invaded!